How to protect your company's data
As with any sophisticated machine, data safeguards for MFPs are
available to IT administrators and users. Manufacturers, dealers and
retailers are all capable of providing support to implement a successful
security strategy. Just as you would install a virus scan on your laptop
or PC, there are tools that can be used to help protect data on MFPs.
Features available to help protect data include:
In addition to the above tools, it's also important to keep in mind the
value of updating the software that runs on MFPs. With new threats
developing on a daily basis, there will always be a need to update the
software that runs your copiers, or any networked peripheral including
printers, fax machines and scanners. Responsible MFP manufacturers make
new patches available for their customers to easily download, through a
website or even RSS feed, so machines can easily be updated with the
latest protection.
MFPs are intricate machines that use a hard drive for many functions,
making them valuable tools to streamline business processes and share
information. By taking advantage of the available options, users can
benefit from these sophisticated machines, while ensuring their
company's and customers' information is secure.
![]() |
A distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack is carried out in two
stages. First, a virus must be spread to multiple computers using the
standard methods for doing so. Once that is complete, a central control
computer issues a command for all the infected computers to begin the
attack. At this point, all the computers begin simultaneously requesting
data from the target in large amounts. This blocks other systems from
being able to communicate with the targeted server, effectively taking
it offline. This is not the first time the Wikileaks has been the victim
of such an attack, although they did seem to be more vulnerable this
time around.
Wikileaks hoped to find some relief in the cloud by utilizing the Amazon
Elastic Cloud Computing (EC2) service. This proved to be a short-lived
venture. As of December 1st, Amazon decided to revoke Wikileaks' ability
to use EC2. This came after much political pressure was put on Amazon by
Congressmen like Senator Joe Leiberman, who released a written statement
saying that "[Amazon's] decision to cut off WikiLeaks now is the right
decision and should set the standard for other companies WikiLeaks is
using to distribute its illegally seized materials." This move has been
met with outcry from Wikileaks supporters who have taken up the cry of
government censorship and quoting the First Amendment in blogs and new
story comments across the internet.
Now that Wikileaks has been removed from the cloud, where they sought
refuge from the DDoS attacks that they have fallen prey to, it remains
to be seen whether there will be more such attacks.
![]() |
Sophos, an internet security company that advertises a variety of email
and encryption services, has released an
article concerning the new Facebook Messages system which focuses on
the new security issues that need to be considered for people who opt to
use it. In it, senior technology consultant Graham Cluley discusses that
the burden of security lies more with the user than with Facebook
itself. He says, "Before signing up, users need to realize that these
new features increase the attack surface on the Facebook platform, and
make personal accounts all the more alluring for cybercriminals to break
into. Facebook accounts will now be linked with many more people in the
users' social circles - opening up new opportunities for identity
fraudsters to launch attacks." Basically, spammers now have more of an
incentive to hack into Facebook accounts using phishing attacks and
exploiting weak passwords.
The other security issue that Cluley discussed was the fact that "users
also need to be aware that Facebook will be storing a complete archive
of all of their communications with one person - this raises concerns as
to how this data could be misused if it fell into the wrong hands."
Imagine every conversation you've ever had with anyone being recorded
and stored on servers you have no control over. All that vital
information in the wrong hands could most certainly spell trouble for
anyone unfortunate enough to fall victim to such a situation. For more
security-based information about the new Facebook Messages system, check
out the Sophos
FAQ about it.
![]() |
Microsoft Office is the collection of several productivity software
products: Word, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint, and OneNote. The
vulnerabilities recently patched spanned two security bulletins,
MS10-087 and
MS10-088. MS10-087 patches five bugs, all of which can allow remote
code execution. They affect all versions of Office, including Office for
Mac. There are three vulnerabilities having to do with the mishandling
of maliciously crafted office files, meaning that a person would need to
open that file on their system, but once they did they would have
complete control over that system. The other two vulnerabilities deal
with the loading of "Rich Text Format" files and DLL files, and are just
as dangerous as the others. MS10-088 is specific to PowerPoint and only
contains two bugs, although they both can allow remote code execution as
well. These are both dealing with maliciously crafted PowerPoint files,
one being a buffer overflow and the other an integer underflow.
Microsoft Forefront is a security software suite for Windows Networks.
You read that correctly, Microsoft sent out a security patch to fix
their security software (something that should probably have been secure
to begin with). UAG is a service that provides security to people
remotely accessing those networks.
MS10-089 details several cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities
plaguing this software. Basically, a hacker can gain elevated privileges
on your machine if you go to a certain URL. This seems like it would
fall into the 'critical' category of bugs, while Microsoft placed it in
the 'important' group. It may seem that this was an underwhelming Patch
Tuesday in volume of patches, but looking at the serious nature of the
vulnerabilities, I would have to say I'm glad they have been fixed.
![]() |
Coverity Inc. is in the business of scanning software for potential
security vulnerabilities. They recently scanned the open-source Android
operating system and discovered 359 bugs. 88 of these are listed as
high-risk which according to
the report, "include four categories that we have found, through
experience and consultation with our customers, to be ones that can
cause the most damage and are most likely to be fixed first by
developers. These include memory corruptions, illegal memory accesses
(e.g., reading beyond the bounds of a memory buffer), resource leaks,
and uninitialized variables. "
Let's look at how those bugs compare in the open source world. Coverity
claims that the industry average 'defect density' is one defect per
every 1,000 lines of code. Android has only half that number, which is
impressive until you look at the areas those bugs were found. Most of
the code in the operating system is a Linux kernel with custom additions
added in, and in the Android specific code, the defect density is twice
as high.
Fragmentation of accountability is listed as one of the main conclusions
of the report. Coverity basically says that, just like the rest of open
source software, with so many people contributing so many different
elements to the project, it is almost impossible to keep track of who is
in charge of fixing what. This is definitely a problem as open source
becomes more and more popular.
The Coverity report can be found
here.
![]() |
The Securelist division of Kaspersky Labs issued a
report yesterday, and the identities of the top three
organizations that have been targeted by phishers may not come as a
surprise to anyone; they're PayPal (with 52.2 percent of all attacks
aimed at it), eBay (with 13.3 percent), and HSBC (with 7.8 percent).
The report, which covered the period between January and March of
this year, next stated, though, "Facebook popped up unexpectedly in
fourth place. This was the first time since we started monitoring
that attacks on a social networking site have been so prolific."
By way of explanation, the report then continued, "Having stolen
users' accounts, the fraudsters can then use them to distribute
spam, sending bulk emails to the account owners and their friends in
the network. This method of distributing spam allows huge audiences
to be reached. Additionally, it lets the fraudsters take advantage
of the social networking sites' additional options, like being able
to send different requests, links to photo's and invitations, all
with the advertisement attached, both within the network and to
users' inboxes."
Obviously, this isn't good news for Facebook's users or the security
community as a whole. Facebook acts as a sort of point of entry to
information about a whole lot of people (the social network had 400
million users in early February).
This isn't good news for Facebook, either, though - nothing that
makes its users uncomfortable or unhappy, and therefore likely to
leave, is - so perhaps we'll at least see the company make some
attempt(s) to address this problem.
Anyway, if you're curious, the list of phishers' targets picked up
after Facebook with Google, the IRS, Rapidshare, Bank of America,
UBI, and Bradesco.
![]() |
A post on the
Official Google Blog announced today, "[D]espite hundreds of
consumer complaints and our own efforts to keep these sites from
tricking people, some scams continue. To fight back, we're working
to stop various fraudulent 'Google Money' schemes, and this week
filed suit against Pacific WebWorks and several other unnamed
defendants."
The post then added, "[W]e're still working constantly to remove
scammy URLs from our index, and we'll permanently disable AdWords
accounts that provide a poor or harmful user experience, whether or
not they use Google's trademarks illegally."
The problem continues to exist, though.
So fair warning: The scams are known to operate under names like the
Earn Google Cash Kit, Google Adwork, Google ATM, Google Biz Kit,
Google Cash, Google Fortune, Google Marketing Kit, Google Profits,
Google StartUp Kit, Google Works, and the Home Business Kit for
Google. From there, they tend to be fairly standard make-money-from
home affairs.
As always, stay sharp.
![]() |
An investigation ordered by Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John
D. Rockefeller IV discovered that Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty
"gain access to online consumers by entering into financial
agreements with reputable online websites and retailers," according
to the official
report.
Then, "[T]he three companies insert their sales offers into the
'post-transaction' phase of an online purchase, after consumers have
made a purchase but before they have completed the sale confirmation
process. These offers generally promise cash back rewards and appear
to be related to the transaction the consumer is in the process of
completing. Misleading 'Yes' and 'Continue' buttons cause consumers
to reasonably think they are completing the original transaction,
rather than entering into a new, ongoing financial relationship with
a membership club operated by Affinion, Vertrue, or Webloyalty."
So individuals wind up paying $9 a month, and companies make
millions. Millions upon millions, really. 1-800-Flowers.com, Buy.com,
Priceline, and US Airways (among many others) were all given more
than $10 million by Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty. Barnes &
Noble, eHarmony, and Pizza Hut received between $1 million and $10
million.
It's a bit scary to see this sort of trickery employed by such
mainstream organizations. Hopefully the committee's report will
force them to clean up their act.
![]() |
Dave DeWalt, the president and CEO of McAfee, said in a statement,
"[S]everal nations around the world are actively engaged in cyberwar-like
preparations and attacks." These include China, France, Israel,
Russia, and the U.S., and it's no secret that the members of this
group aren't all on great terms.
What's more, cyberwarfare's barrier to entry is so low in comparison
to traditional hostilities (a roomful of computers vs. thousands of
men, tanks, and airplanes) that lots of other countries are almost
sure to pursue the idea.
Then, if and when the virtual bullets start flying, things could get
really nasty. McAfee reported, "Attackers are not only building
their cyberdefenses, but cyberoffenses, targeting infrastructure
such as power grids, transportation, telecommunication, finance and
water supplies, because damage can be done quickly and with little
effort."
At least this state of affairs would create a good job market for
security professionals. Everybody else might benefit in a physical
manner from the dive-and-unplug exercises, too.
![]() |
ICSA Labs, which is based in Pennsylvania and has been around for 20
years, tests and sometimes certifies products. Emphasis on
"sometimes."
An
ICSA Labs Product Assurance Report indicated that just 4 percent
of security products attain certification following a first round of
testing. Most have to try again between one and three times before
making the cut.
And it's not guaranteed that a product will ever meet the necessary
standards, either. According to ICSA Labs, only about 82 percent of
products attain certification in the end, meaning about one-fifth of
all applicants (and perhaps a much larger percentage of products)
aren't up to snuff.
So leave the shakedown cruises to less cautious individuals. Just
repeat "patience is a virtue" a few times and read reviews while
you're waiting, and remember that things will be less likely to blow
up in your face when you finally get onboard.
![]() |
Nigeria's Economic and Financial Crimes Commission is the force
behind Project Eagle Claw, and with Microsoft's help, has just
started ramping it up. Waziri explained in a
statement, "We expect that Eagle Claw as conceived will be 100%
operational within six months and at full capacity, it will take
Nigeria out of the top 10 list of countries with the highest
incidence of fraudulent e-mails."
She then gave some very interesting details, continuing, "[U]pon
full deployment, the capacity to take down fraudulent e-mails will
increase to 5,000 monthly. Further it is projected that advisory
mails to be sent to victims and potential victims will be about
230,000 monthly."
Anything Nigeria can do to address the problem of scammers operating
from within its borders will of course be good for the country's
image. More than that, it might help honest Nigerians become part of
the online world (since some entities have just taken to blocking
troubled regions as a whole).
Then there will be the benefit to the rest of the world, with maybe
millions of dollars not getting lost. For that reason, Project Eagle
Claw is likely to gain a lot of fans.
![]() |
Don't jump to the conclusion that the project's run by a bunch of
supervillains; the malware samples are supposed to be "offered for
the purposes of analysis, testing and malware research."
Also, customers are screened, and a monthly access fee of about
$1,235 should act to keep out some of the riffraff.
It actually seems possible that the
Malware Distribution Project could be of great help to the
security community. When you consider that medical researchers don't
have to wander from house to house, asking people if they have
cancer, every time they want to start a new experiment, certain
practices start to seem a little outdated.
There is a potential for problems, though. One nightmare scenario
relates to the Malware Distribution Project's figurative walls
failing and everything getting out. Having all of that malware run
amuck at once - particularly if security researchers' computers were
the first things it'd come across - would be bad.
Then there's the possibility that some unpleasant person would gain
access to the Malware Distribution Project's archive and just sort
of go on a shopping spree. This way, some relatively stupid hacker
might be able to get his (or her) hands on the most sophisticated
viruses in existence.
As you might imagine, the Malware Distribution Project is definitely
proving divisive.
Anyway, at last count, the repository contained a whopping 3,336,503
files.
UPDATE (10-13-09): Anthony Aykut, the Managing Director of
Frame4 Security Services, got in touch with SecurityProNews this
morning to pass along some information. In an email, he wrote, "[T]he
malware is neither downloadable via the web site or accessible in
any other way via the www; in fact, the (secure) servers where the
malware is stored (or analyzed/processed) is not even connected to
the outside world."
Aykut also stressed that nothing is sold to the public, and added,
"Largely due to the security measure(s) mentioned above, and also
based on to the fact that the storage media are protected by
biometric devices, getting access to the MD:Pro archive is, well,
pretty impossible."
![]() |
Avsim is one of the best-known flight sim communities in
existence. It's been around for a long time, too. Unfortunately, a
hacker managed to wipe about a decade's worth of modification info
and forum posts from the site's servers back in May.
Now, though, Tom Allensworth, the publisher and CEO of Avsim, has
told the
BBC, "We . . . have incontrovertible evidence of the individual
that performed the hack. We have protected the forensic evidence and
provided that evidence to the London police. We are committed to
bringing justice to bear on this case."
Allensworth is confident in the outcome, too, adding, "We fully
expect that the criminal complaint . . . will result in the
perpetrator spending some time behind bars - under UK law." (Since
Avsim's located in the US, this means he's not pushing for
extradition or anything of that sort.)
Neither London's Metropolitan Police Service nor the accused
individual (who hasn't been publicly named) has made any comment
yet.
![]() |
Tom Jackman wrote in an article for the Washington Post, "[S]ervices
as YourHackerz.com are still active and plentiful, with clever names
like 'piratecrackers.com' and 'hackmail.net.' They boast of having
little trouble hacking into such Web-based e-mail systems as AOL,
Yahoo, Gmail, Facebook and Hotmail, and they advertise openly."
Jackman found that prices for passwords range from around $30 to
$100, which means that even the average ten-year-old can probably
afford these hackers' services.
Plus, unless someone important is involved or things get rather
serious, law enforcement isn't terribly likely to look into (or at
least resolve) the matter, because accessing a computer without
authorization is just a misdemeanor in most areas and tracking down
a perpetrator can be difficult.
And it doesn't help, of course, that all of these facts have now
been publicized in a widely-read newspaper.
So if you've got some nasty business rivals or psycho exes, at least
try to play it safe by changing your password often for as long as
you're in the person's sights. Then there's always the option of
putting a few more miles on the odometer, too.